North Face vs Patagonia: Battle of the Microprocessors
When it comes to outdoor clothing brands, North Face and Patagonia are two of the most popular brands in the game. These two competitors have a lot in common, but also have some distinguishing differences. One of the biggest differences between these two brands is the technology they use in their clothing, specifically in their microprocessors. In this post, we'll compare the microprocessor technologies used by North Face and Patagonia and see how they stack up against each other.
North Face
North Face uses a technology called Fuseform. This technology allows the company to weave different fabrics together, creating a single piece of fabric that is both lighter and stronger than traditional fabrics. Fuseform technology is used in North Face's jackets, pants, and backpacks.
In addition to Fuseform, North Face also uses a microprocessor technology called Futurelight. Futurelight is a waterproof and breathable fabric membrane that is designed to allow air to pass in and out while keeping water out. This technology is used in North Face's high-performance jackets.
Patagonia
Patagonia uses a technology called H2No. H2No is a waterproof and breathable fabric that is used in a variety of Patagonia's products, including jackets, pants, and backpacks. H2No is made with a waterproof coating that is both durable and lightweight.
Patagonia also uses a microprocessor technology called Capilene. Capilene is a moisture-wicking fabric that is designed to keep the wearer warm and dry while they are active. This technology is used in Patagonia's base layers, shirts, and pants.
Comparison
North Face and Patagonia both offer high-quality microprocessor technologies in their clothing lines. While North Face offers the Futurelight technology in their high-performance jackets, Patagonia offers the versatile H2No technology that covers a range of their products. Additionally, North Face has the Fuseform technology that weaves different fabrics together making one stronger and lighter fabric, whereas Patagonia's Capilene fabric technology is primarily a moisture-wicking base layer.
Overall, both North Face and Patagonia offer great microprocessor technologies for their products, and the choice between the two ultimately comes down to personal preference and specific needs.
References
- The North Face. (n.d.). Fuseform Technology
- The North Face. (n.d.). Futurelight Technology
- Patagonia. (n.d.). H2No Performance Fabric
- Patagonia. (n.d.). Capilene Fabric Technology